Wednesday, January 15, 2014
Leven Thumps Reading Response
There is a lot of injustice in the book Leven Thumps and The Gateway to Foo. Both Leven and Winter have very unkind parents.
Their parents see them as pests and just another mouth to feed. For example in the book it says, "As Janet would stuff her face, Winter would sit their with nothing but her usual dinner: a half dozen peas, which Janet had usually picked from her meal, a single crust of bread, and a spoonful of sugar-free strawberry jam- sugar free because Janet had once read how bad sugar was for children." All they do is keep their children alive, they don't provide love or care.
It is really unfair that their parents get all this stuff and they don't get anything. For example the children only have one pair of clothes that they have to wear everyday. It isn't fair because it ruins their self-image at school, people make fun of them and they don't have any friends. It could be understandable if the parents couldn't afford more clothes, but they can and they just choose not too.
Leven and Winter have miserable lives due to this unkindness. This kind of parental treatment can cause kids to run away, or do other bad things.
Wednesday, November 20, 2013
Social Justice Project Entry
v Think about one of the following: Movies,
TV Shows, and Young Adult Fiction. Think
about how people your age are portrayed.
What are “normal” teens supposed to look like? What race are they (generally)? Where do they live? How much money do they have? What is their family like? Write about what you think about the images portrayed
in Movies, TV, or YA. Do you think these
are accurate portrayals of the way young people live in our world? Do they perpetuate stereotypes or break them?
If you look at the
majority of movies today that are supposed to portray teens, most of them are
way off the mark. The majority of teens
are white, rich, “beautiful”, skinny, and live in fabulous homes, and if old
enough, drive fabulous cars. These are
very inaccurate portrayals of teenagers.
Most real teens don’t have perfect hair, flawless complexion, and white
teeth. Adolescence is a difficult stage
of life, so most have some acne, or “unattractive” body shapes. Occasionally, in a movie you will see an
overweight person, or someone with pimples, but they always play the
weirdo’s. When kids see these “perfect”
people, they think that they have to be “perfect” too. They try to change themselves so that they
will be seen as more pretty. They become
hard on themselves, and convince themselves that they are ugly. Society should show teens how they really
are. Not everyone is perfect, and if you
aren’t, there is nothing to be ashamed of.
Monday, November 11, 2013
Banning Books Argument Letter
Dear Ms.
Berner,
November 11, 2013
I have received word that you have been
considering banning books in 6th grade libraries. I do not believe that you should do
this. I believe that banning these books is a form of censorship, a violation of our first amendment
rights, by prejudice. I think that if you stop the 6th graders from reading a
book, because of someone else’s beliefs, they will be less prepared for the real
world. I believe children along with their parents should decide what they should and shouldn't read, despite how disturbing a book may be. Only parents and their kids really know whether they are ready to handle a particular
subject. I believe that there are valuable life lessons to be learned, and understood from reading certain books, and many children want to have the freedom to read them.
To begin with, books are challenged because they have
topics that are considered inappropriate, such as drugs, death, and sex. Adults try to ban books with these things in them because they believe that
young adults shouldn’t be exposed to such harsh topics. People
also ban books because they feel that they violate their religion or their
beliefs. I feel that this is unfair because not everyone has the same beliefs.
Many books are written for a
purpose. There is usually a valuable lesson to be learned from the book.
The article, "'Sick-lit'? Evidently young adult fiction is too complex for the Daily Mail" by Michelle Pauli, states, “Children and
teens – well, all of us really – read to explore and experience other lives and
thoughts and situations in a safe way, not purely for escapism and adventures
and fantasy”. This is definitely true for me. For example, a
commonly banned book, “The Fault in Our Stars” by John Green, is challenged
because of the tough topic of cancer, and death. I really enjoyed this
book, because I felt like it would help me tackle real-life situations.
It taught me about love, friendship, and family in midst of the horrible
situation they were in. Even though I haven't experienced these problems specifically, I can still relate to it because I know what it is like to go through difficult situations and I believe it will help me handle situations in the future. Most banned books have a lesson to be learned
that will help prepare readers for these tough issues in their own lives.
If people try to censor books, they aren’t
allowing the author to choose his words, and authors choose to use certain
words on purpose, no matter how harsh they may be. Some people want to
change the words, and I feel like they shouldn’t be able to do that.
There are already organizations that regulate author’s content. Writers
of children and teen books, have to adhere to
certain rules of conduct. “They
also adhere to codes of suitability around the three Ss – swearing, shagging
and slaughter – to a much greater extent than writers in other forms of media
regularly consumed by teens.” states Michelle Pauli in her article "'Sick-lit'? Evidently young adult
fiction is too complex for the Daily Mail". Further editing by prejudice and judgmental people is not
only a violation of the constitution, but it is just plain wrong. Come
on, when they are banning Captain Underpants, a hilarious children’s book, it
is getting ridiculous. According to the article "Why ‘Captain
Underpants’ Is The Most Banned Book In America" by Pamela Engel, when the
first book of the series came out, there was a Sturgeon General’s Warning that
said, "Some material in this book may be considered offensive by
people who don't wear underwear.” It received other criticism because the main character was flying around in his underwear. What kind of message are we telling kids about their bodies, when we can’t see a comic character flying around in a
cape and his underwear? Who didn’t do this as a kid in his or her own
bedroom? And I haven’t seen one kid come to school in his underwear, so it
doesn’t affect them in that way. Books like these, we can relate to, and
they are funny.
In conclusion, please do not ban books because reading different kinds of books including ones with
tough topics such as sex, depression, death, and illness, all issues that we
are going to face eventually, help prepare us for life. The books soften
the blow, because they are not real life, yet.
Sincerely,
Louis Celi
Sunday, October 20, 2013
"Where Your Cellphone Goes to Die" Response
The article, "Where Your Cellphone Goes to Die" by Leyla Acaroglu is about how e-waste negatively affects people in impoverished places, and steps that can be taken to help stop this from happening. It is not acceptable for electronics manufacturers to pay developing countries to take the U.S.'s e-waste. There are several ways that U.S. cellphone manufacturers can change their e-trash disposal practices.
Exporting e-waste affects the health of women, and children in places like India, China, and Ghana. The major health issue deals with toxins produced when women, and children attempt to remove materials from the e-waste that they can sell. For example, "Greenpeace, the Basel Action Network, and others have posted YouTube videos of children inhaling the smoke from burned phone casings as they identify and separate different kinds of plastics for recyclers." As a result of exporting e-waste the U.S. is indirectly harming women, and children in other countries.
One way that U.S. cellphone manufacturers can change their e-trash disposal practices is by following Japan's example and requiring manufacturers to establish their own recycling facilities. Or they can make cellphones easier to dismantle, thus reducing the risks posed by crude recycling techniques, like those employed by children in Ghana.
The U.S. can take steps to improve the harmful effect our e-waste has on the world. It comes down to the government taking action to limit or eliminate the export of toxic waste or to require manufacturers to properly recycle their own products. We as consumers can also help by replacing these products less often, or pressing for safe recycling.
Exporting e-waste affects the health of women, and children in places like India, China, and Ghana. The major health issue deals with toxins produced when women, and children attempt to remove materials from the e-waste that they can sell. For example, "Greenpeace, the Basel Action Network, and others have posted YouTube videos of children inhaling the smoke from burned phone casings as they identify and separate different kinds of plastics for recyclers." As a result of exporting e-waste the U.S. is indirectly harming women, and children in other countries.
One way that U.S. cellphone manufacturers can change their e-trash disposal practices is by following Japan's example and requiring manufacturers to establish their own recycling facilities. Or they can make cellphones easier to dismantle, thus reducing the risks posed by crude recycling techniques, like those employed by children in Ghana.
The U.S. can take steps to improve the harmful effect our e-waste has on the world. It comes down to the government taking action to limit or eliminate the export of toxic waste or to require manufacturers to properly recycle their own products. We as consumers can also help by replacing these products less often, or pressing for safe recycling.
Tuesday, October 8, 2013
THE END OF AMERICA'S CAR CULTURE?: Upfront Article Response
YOUNG PEOPLE GIVE UP CAR CULTURE FOR INTERNET
In the article "The End of America's Car Culture" the author, Alessandra Potenza, says that years ago young people were all crazy for cars and they were a symbol of the American dream. Young people of today don't seem to be as interested in cars, as their parents and grandparents were at the same age. There are many causes for the decline including, revival of cities, more eco friendly transportation, rising gas and insurance costs, and the internet. Teenagers and young adults instead seem to be more interested in the new technology.
One cause for the decrease in interest of cars, is the comeback of the cities. Potenza states that "America grew more prosperous and Baby Boomers--those born between 1946 and 1964-- began leaving cities in search of safer, less-crowded places to raise families." Not only did you need a car in the suburbs to get around, but it was a time when two cars in the garage became a popular symbol of the American dream. Today, cities have become much more popular, and have easily accessible shops, cafes, and activities that you can walk or bike to. Walking, biking, and taking public transit is becoming more appealing to more young people who are environmentally conscience. Most are aware of their carbon footprint. Calvin Leckenby, a 15 year old high school student states, "I don't really think that cars are a great thing to be using and I love to ride my bike."
Another cause for the decline in car culture is that the cost of owning a car is more expensive. With gas prices at about $4 dollars a gallon, and insurance rates sky high, many would like to spend their money elsewhere. They would prefer to spend it on new mobile devices and gadgets.
In the text, researcher Thilo Koslowski says, "The i-Phone is the Ford Mustang of today. He means that the Ford Mustang used to be considered a status symbol, because everyone was into the car culture and wanted a cool car. Cars were a way for young people to socialize. They would go to drive-ins to see movies and drive throughs to eat food. Today the i-Phone is use to socialize by connecting online to research restaurants, text friends to meet or just chat. Status is determined by the cutting edge technology that you have.
I totally agree with the researcher. Everyone wants the newest versions, and they aren't cheap. My dad went to Verizon to get me a new phone and couldn't get in the door because the line was all the way down the block for the new i-Phone! That says it all, need I say more!
The article "The End of America's Car Culture" by Alessandra Potenza, shows that America's car culture does seem to be coming to an end and technology culture is taking over.
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
"The Fault in Our Stars" Inquiry Question #1 Response
The book "The Fault in Our Stars", by John Green, is about a sixteen year old girl named Hazel with stage IV Thyroid Cancer, and her struggles to maintain good health. She falls in love with a boy named Augustus Waters, who had cancer as well and lost a leg from it. There are various sub-issues in the book, but they all stem from the main issue of Hazel having cancer.
The major issue in the book is Hazel having cancer. Her whole life, unfortunately, seems to revolve around her cancer. She doesn't go to school, and she doesn't have many friends. She always has to worry about having her lung machine close by. She is also constantly thinking that she might die soon.
Another issue is Hazel's relationship with Augustus, and whether or not to officially date. Augustus loves her and wants to have more of a relationship. She loves him back, but she doesn't want to take it any further because she might die, and she doesn't want to hurt him in that way.
A final issue is Hazel's relationship with her parents. Her mom wants her to have a life, to go out and have fun, but Hazel is afraid to do that because she has little experience going out. So she feels pressured by her mom, and they argue a bit. Another problem is that she is being defiant toward her parents. But she is a teenager and has mood swings and rebellious instincts (which is normal), so you can't really blame her.
The many different issues in the book "The Fault in Our Stars", by John Greene are treated in various ways during the story. The author inspires people to not give up the fight, to keep on going until the end.
The major issue in the book is Hazel having cancer. Her whole life, unfortunately, seems to revolve around her cancer. She doesn't go to school, and she doesn't have many friends. She always has to worry about having her lung machine close by. She is also constantly thinking that she might die soon.
Another issue is Hazel's relationship with Augustus, and whether or not to officially date. Augustus loves her and wants to have more of a relationship. She loves him back, but she doesn't want to take it any further because she might die, and she doesn't want to hurt him in that way.
A final issue is Hazel's relationship with her parents. Her mom wants her to have a life, to go out and have fun, but Hazel is afraid to do that because she has little experience going out. So she feels pressured by her mom, and they argue a bit. Another problem is that she is being defiant toward her parents. But she is a teenager and has mood swings and rebellious instincts (which is normal), so you can't really blame her.
The many different issues in the book "The Fault in Our Stars", by John Greene are treated in various ways during the story. The author inspires people to not give up the fight, to keep on going until the end.
Friday, September 27, 2013
"Faithful Elephants; A True Story of Animals, People, and War" Reading Response
The story "Faithful Elephants" by Yukio Tsuchiya is about a zoo in Japan during World War II. The government orders the zookeepers to kill all the dangerous animals, in case a bomb explodes and blows open the cages and they escape. They are trying to avoid animals attacking people. Three elephants needed to be killed, and the zookeepers had to starve them.
The theme of this story is that war doesn't just harm the soldiers fighting, but also innocent people and animals. War is terrible, it shouldn't happen. Society should find a way to solve war, they should try to negotiate more, and not be so violent. In the end war barely solves any problems.
The government shouldn't have put the zookeepers in the position of having to kill the animals. They should find another way to solve this problem, for example moving the animals to a shelter until the war is over. The zookeepers must have felt so heartbroken and guilty that they had to let the elephants starve. The zookeepers loved the elephants, and felt so bad for them. The story shows this when the trainer gives the elephants food and water when they are starving, even though he could get in serious trouble for it. "He carried food and pails of water to them and threw it at their feet. 'Here!' he said, sobbing, and clung to their thin legs. 'Eat your food! Please drink. Drink your water!'" This piece of text evidence shows that the government is causing such sorrow for the zookeepers. It isn't fair, the government got themselves into the war, so they should deal with having to kill the elephants, they shouldn't make the zookeepers do it for them.
I was very touched by this story. I really agreed with theme, and that war should be stopped. I thought that the killing of the elephants was very melancholy, the elephants were so pitiful, and innocent.
The story "Faithful Elephants" is about war and how it affects everything, even innocent animals. The story challenges the reader to fight against war, and try to stop it from happening. The author does this by telling the reader, through the theme, that war is horrible, and harms every single thing, not just the military.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)